Well, Xhin, nice charade, but it’s over.
You played an unusual game. You attempted to make your weird antics seem normal by saying that you’d be using unusual tactics to catch people.
`Roxas`, a member of the Mafia came on the chopping block. You didn’t vote for him in hopes that he wouldn’t be eliminated in Day 1. Too bad for you.
Then, at the beginning of Day 2, you said this:
It's actually better to look at who DID vote for `roxas`. It's like a sensor but all the mafia probably voted for him.
It’s a clever way to make yourself look innocent in front of the town. You know what? The mafia don’t want to look suspicious, so they probably all voted for their own member! That means that everyone who didn’t vote for `Roxas` (HINT: ME, WINK WINK) are innocent!
You then went on to suggest that each day we kill a person from the group of people who voted for `Roxas`. That was a foolish idea. Let’s suppose that the other 4 Mafia members *had* voted for `Roxas`. 2 Town-sided roles were dead at that point leaving the total remaining town-sided roles at 12. There were 8 members in that group of people to vote off every day. Let’s say we killed off all 4 innocent people. 12 – 4 = 8. Additionally, the mafia could expect about 4 night kills. That leaves us with 8 – 4 = 4. Aha! And so we see that the mafia could easily win with this strategy, especially if not all of he mafia members voted for `Roxas`.
In Day 2, you started to throw suspicion toward me for my use of the word “guys” in Day 1. If you look at that day round, however, up to that point, the only person to use the word “guys” was you, and you used it far more than I did. It seems you were trying to piggy back off of Majora’s thought that someone was Mafia for saying “FAW.” Use a similar strategy so you look innocent, eh?
In Day 3, you threw this idea out there.
With the mafia numbers depleted, they're probably looking to stir up misinformation to keep themselves from being killed by watchful players. My guess is that chiefsonny was completely wrong about something and they're trying to make us think he was completely right so we lynch someone innocent.
It’s interesting that the following two days, Redack and Majora were killed, the two people who, at various times, seemed to be gunning for me the most. You see, by putting that idea out there first that the mafia were targetting people who were wrong, you were in essence trying to make the town think that the mafia was trying to make it look like they were going after the wrong people but were actually going after the right people. You thought two steps ahead to try to get rid of me, since you thought it would be easy.
Next, you led a very successful campaign to attempt to lynch Trever Leingod. After a great deal of people jumped on the bandwagon, you randomly changed your mind.
Also, I'm pretty sure Trever is innocent now. He seemed guilty when I was the only one attacking him, but now that a lot of people have jumped on the idea, I can see where he really stands. He's still on my guilty list, but lower down. We can always lynch him later, just like you guys need to lynch me eventually since I keep swaying votes.
That’s another reason I voted for Trever yesterday. I thought that he was actually guilty, and you were trying to make it seem like both of you were innocent by leading the charge against him then dropping it when he had “decent” answers. It turns out that I was wrong, but now my theory has melded to you trying to get Trever, but when he turned out to be able to answer your questions well, you shifted your suspicion to someone else. You could have gotten Trever lynched, but you decided to go against someone else because you would look too bad with Trever lynched so easily.
You then went very strong against White Thunder, despite no counter-claim to his Drug Dealer claim. He was innocent too! It’s amazing that you weren’t accused in Day 4. I think you expected to be, which is why you lay low that day. Despite that, there is still more to say on Day 3.
You also said this.
I'd advise you guys to keep an eye on Redack, especially if Yeano turns out to be innocent.
You said this, and then the next night, Redack dies. This further supports the argument. You made that sentence in a very clever way. Assume Yeano is innocent. Then Redack must be guilty. Then the mafia goes and kills Redack. Well, it would only make sense then that Yeano is really guilty, right? That’s what you had planned for Day 4.
At the beginning of Day 4, you said
I think lynching yeano is worth a shot so id like to vote for him but im on mobile so cant.
You were obviously trying to get me lynched, but it didn’t work. Majora voted for CtR Black instead. In the spirit of laying low and seeing that you couldn’t get me killed, you just decided to vote with Majora against CtR Black.
Going with majora on this one (sorry I can't say more but I just got home)
Toward the end of the day, Majora said that if Trever was innocent, it would completely clear me of all suspicions in his mind. You, again, tried to twist this into your favor by killing Majora and making it seem like he would be against me if Trever were innocent. He probably would have been, but that’s exactly what you were banking on.
And that brings me to one last thing you said.
Yes, I could be a mafia member that's leading you astray, so I'd advise you to kill me at some point if you think so.
That’s a nice way to look innocent, but I’m going to take your advice now.
